Jump To Navigation
We Get Results Call Today Toll Free: 877-440-0020 or Local: 312-440-0020 Or use this form to tell us about your case
I have read the disclaimer. disclaimer.

Zimmerman Law Offices, P.C.
77 West Washington St
Suite 1220
Chicago, IL 60602
Map & Directions
Phone: 312-440-0020
Fax: 312-440-4180
Email me

In The News

Johnson Elementary injunction postponed

By Brett Koppen

A DuPage County judge Tuesday postponed a ruling for a permanent injunction that would close Johnson Elementary School for the start of classes.

Attorneys acting on behalf of a group of parents had filed an emergency motion to close the school. Judge Robert Lukas postponed the case because he was not as familiar with it as Judge Hollis Webster, who is on vacation this week. The hearing was pushed back to 9 a.m. Tuesday, Aug. 17, at the DuPage County Civil Courthouse, 505 N. County Farm Road, in Wheaton.

"We'd like to have a resolution," said Plaintiff's Attorney Thomas Zimmerman. "We're ready to go."

A lawsuit in 1997 was brought about by a group of parents against District 200, which claims that Johnson Elementary was responsible for illnesses suffered by several students. Tuesday's hearing was scheduled to prevent Johnson from opening for regular classes Aug. 24. Attorneys for the parents claim the school is still unsafe.

Zimmerman claims that two studies, one conducted by a janitor at the school, another by a company contracted by the district, supports the parents' allegations. He said one report cites leaky pipes and ceilings, along with high mold spore counts in the school.

"These are the types of problems that cause the illnesses of which the children are complaining," he said. "If the district wants to try to show the school is clean, I'm certain the judge will provide them with an opportunity at that time [next Tuesday]."

District 200 Communications Director Denie Young said the district has offered compensation for the individuals names in the lawsuit. The district is offering to provide transportation for students if they wish to attend a different school this year.

Zimmerman said the offer by the district is unacceptable.

"If that's the case, it's a half-hearted offer," he said. "What happens to those kids that were pulled out a long time ago? [The offer] is for the parents whose kids are starting in the fall, and that's it."

District 200 officials insist that Johnson is safe, and are giving parents a chance to express their concerns in an open forum. A meeting is scheduled for 7:30 p.m., Wednesday, Aug. 18, at Johnson, and Young said the school encourages anyone with questions to attend.

"We have sent a letter to all the Johnson parents, assuring them that we believe Johnson is a safe school," Young said. "At that [meeting], we will address all the activities that have taken place in the last 18 months to improve air quality at the school."

Young also disputes the reports that say the school is still unsafe.

"There is no industry standard for what is safe and what isn't," she said. "There isn't a cut-off that says, 'OK, your school is safe' or, 'your school isn't safe.'"

Verdicts & Settlements

Mother Loses Child Custody and Visitation — Following a lengthy trial to determine the best interests of the children, a mother going through a divorce lost custody of her children to her husband and she was also denied any visitation with her minor children. We were retained after the trial to appeal the decision. We successfully appealed the trial court's decision denying visitation by demonstrating that visitation would not endanger the children's physical, mental, moral or emotional health, and the appellate court ordered the trial court to fashion appropriate visitation. In this matter, we also filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue of whether a state court rule violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment where the rule precludes the court from exercising its discretion, in the interest of fundamental fairness, to allow an untimely appeal from a court order terminating a parent's liberty interest to the care and custody of her children.