Clarendon Hills mom suing toy companyBy Eric Martin Harold the Helicopter was supposed to be guaranteed for a lifetime, according to a pending lawsuit. Instead, after Harold broke, the maker of the popular Thomas the Tank Engine toys told a Clarendon Hills mom that the lifetime warrant would no longer be honored, according to the woman's lawyer. Now, Lucy Brady is suing the maker of the helicopter, the tank engine and Cranky the Crane in Cook County court. In 2003, Oak Brook-based RC2 Corp. purchased Learning Curve, the company that makes the Thomas the Tank Engine toys, as well as others, according to the lawsuit. Later, RC2 turned the lifetime warranty into a 90-day limited warranty. "Instead of changing the warranty from purchases from that point forward, they made it retroactive and applied it to all products that had been sold prior to that time," said Thomas Zimmerman, a Chicago attorney representing Brady. "That's a breach of warranty," he said. An attorney and a spokeswoman for the company could not be reached for comment. The company has yet to file an answer to the original complaint, filed in February. Brady is joined in the lawsuit by another Chicago area mother who purchased a Cranky the Crane toy that later broke. Zimmerman is seeking to make the case a class-action lawsuit, which could include anyone who has had a Learning Curve toy break under the lifetime warranty and has been unable to get a repair or replacement. The lawsuit seeks monetary damages for broken toys and asks the court to order the company to follow the lifetime warranty. "All Learning Curve toys are unconditionally guaranteed for life!" read two Learning Curve fliers - attached to the lawsuit - for the Thomas the Tank Engine toys. Harold the Helicopter does not appear on the flier, but the document does include more than 40 other characters from the popular show, including Thomas the Tank Engine and James the Red Engine. Zimmerman said Brady and others paid a higher price for Thomas the Tank Engine products in part because of the lifetime guarantee. "Because of the longevity of the product, they were willing to pay a premium for it," the lawyer said. Professor Joseph Stone, director of Loyola University's Business Law Center, said that based on the statement on the flier, a company probably would have to go along with the original lifetime warranty. Still, Stone said much will depend on the terms of RC2's acquisition of Learning Curve. "Whether or not they can disassociate themselves from the warranty of a prior company is a question the court is going to have to consider," Stone said. The Doings Newspapers 07-13-2006 (Thomas the Train) [PDF Download] |
Zimmerman Law Offices, P.C.
77 West Washington St
Suite 1220
Chicago, IL 60602
Map & Directions
Phone: 312-440-0020
Fax: 312-440-4180
Email me
Mother Loses Child Custody and Visitation — Following a lengthy trial to determine the best interests of the children, a mother going through a divorce lost custody of her children to her husband and she was also denied any visitation with her minor children. We were retained after the trial to appeal the decision. We successfully appealed the trial court's decision denying visitation by demonstrating that visitation would not endanger the children's physical, mental, moral or emotional health, and the appellate court ordered the trial court to fashion appropriate visitation. In this matter, we also filed a petition for a writ of certiorari to the U.S. Supreme Court on the issue of whether a state court rule violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment where the rule precludes the court from exercising its discretion, in the interest of fundamental fairness, to allow an untimely appeal from a court order terminating a parent's liberty interest to the care and custody of her children.
